Scientific Method 9/11

Advancing Rigorous Inquiry into 9/11

Scientific Method 9/11 is a moderated research forum founded by academic professionals to foster evidence-based analysis of the September 11, 2001 attacks. Administered by scientists—including Ph.D. physicists, engineers, and computer scientists from institutions like Cambridge University and Humboldt University—the organization applies rigorous scholarly standards to evaluate 9/11 research. Its core mission is to facilitate open yet disciplined discourse on unresolved anomalies, prioritizing the Pentagon event and structural failures like World Trade Center Building 7, which prominent figures recently declared a controlled demolition.

Unique Model & Impact

• Moderated Peer Review: Submissions undergo structured critique by subject-matter experts, ensuring scientific integrity. Discussions are archived transparently, with revisions tracked publicly.

• Accelerated Research Catalysis: Rapid dissemination of findings (1–4 weeks for publication) and creation of a living repository for high-impact work challenging NIST collapse narratives.

• Neutral Arbitration: A moderator panel resolves disputes and highlights consensus areas, appealing to skeptics alienated by partisan rhetoric.

2025 Relevance & Momentum

Amid surging public skepticism, the organization bridges academia and activism. It supports technical experts—like those in Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth—by peer-reviewing structural analyses cited in Congressional calls for new investigations. With political leaders and the New York Fire Department demanding accountability, the forum's impartial rigor amplifies credibility.

How You Can Advance This Work

Explore their research repository and submission guidelines:

🔗ScientificMethod911.org

9/11 Truth Organizations